Macro criada para criar pontos e possibilitar criar malha triangular em pontos não gerados no Bentley topoGRAPH. over 2 years ago. One of the most requested tasks when managing 3D scanning data is the conversion of point clouds into more practical triangular meshes. Topografia 1 - Interpolação com Malha Triangular e Quadriculação. UNICAP – Universidade Católica de Pernambuco Laboratório de Topografia da UNICAP -.


Author: Armani Anderson
Country: Burundi
Language: English
Genre: Education
Published: 3 October 2014
Pages: 32
PDF File Size: 24.87 Mb
ePub File Size: 32.14 Mb
ISBN: 179-7-82317-433-6
Downloads: 45117
Price: Free
Uploader: Armani Anderson


Information Request Box

Obviously in this way the full point cloud will have a normal field that is by far smoother than necessary, but this is not an issue for most surface reconstruction algorithms but it is an issue if you want to use these normals for shading! Surface reconstruction Once rough normals are available Poisson surface reconstruction is a good choice.

Using the original point cloud with the computed normals we build a surface at the highest resolution recursion level Recovering malha triangular color Here we have two options, recovering color as a texture or recovering color as per-vertex color.

Here we go for the latter, leaving the former to a next post where we will go in more details on the new automatic parametrization stuff malha triangular we are adding in MeshLab.

Obviously if you store color onto vertexes you need to have a very dense mesh, more or less of the same magnitudo of the original point cloud, so probably refining large faces a bit could be useful.

Increasing the Element Order Increasing the element order is advantageous in the sense that no remeshing is needed; the same mesh can be used, but malha triangular different element orders.

Remeshing can be time consuming for complex 3D geometries or the mesh may come from an external source and malha triangular be altered.

File:Dolphin triangle - Wikimedia Commons

The disadvantage to malha triangular technique is that the computational requirements increase faster than with other mesh refinement techniques. A series of simulations illustrating increases in the element order. The same finite element mesh, but solved with different element orders.

Global Adaptive Mesh Refinement Global adaptive mesh refinement uses an malha triangular estimation strategy to determine the point in the modeling domain where the local error is largest.

Malha plana por polígonos regulares

The FEA software then takes this error estimation and uses the information to generate an entirely malha triangular mesh. Smaller elements are used in regions where the local error is significant, and the local error throughout the model is considered.

The advantage here is that the software will do all of the mesh refinement. The drawback malha triangular that the user has no control over the mesh.


As such, excessive mesh refinement may occur in regions that are of less interest, regions where a larger local error is acceptable. An example of using global adaptive mesh refinement. Global adaptive mesh refinement changes the element sizes in a nonuniform manner.

Local Adaptive Mesh Refinement Local adaptive mesh refinement differs from global adaptive mesh refinement in that the error is evaluated only over some subset of the entire model space, with respect to a specific metric. Malha triangular example, it is possible to refine the mesh such that stresses at the boundary of a hole are more accurately resolved.

This meshing strategy will still remesh the entire model with the objective of reducing the error in one region. If a logical and malha triangular local metric exists with respect to which mesh can be malha triangular, the local adaptive approach is superior to global adaptive mesh refinement. Simulations demonstrate the use of the local adaptive approach to refining meshes.

Local adaptive mesh refinement with respect to the stresses at a point. Manually Adjusting the Mesh The most labor intensive approach is for the analyst to manually create a series of different finite element meshes based upon the physics of the particular problem and an intuition as to where finer elements may be needed.

For 2D models, a combination of triangular and quadrilateral elements can be used. In the case of 3D models, a combination of tetrahedral, hexahedral also called brickstriangular prismatic, and pyramidal elements can be used.

While triangular and malha triangular elements can be utilized to mesh any geometry, the quadrilateral, malha triangular, prismatic, and pyramidal elements are helpful when the solution is known to vary gradually along one or more directions.

By elongating, or shrinking, elements in certain directions, the mesh can be malha triangular to the variation in the fields. Manually created mesh of a plate featuring a hole. A manually created mesh of a plate with a hole.


Varying sizes of triangular and elongated quadrilateral elements are used.